1. She has been a leader on many important policies that have been instituted, and many which were rejected by the Republican majority. For example, she took a stand on delaying revaluation to save residential taxpayers money, and when that was rejected by the Republicans, she alone pushed for phasing in revaluation, and won, since state law fortunately allows the Town Meeting to vote on this. For years, on the Board of Finance and the Board of Selectmen, she tried (but failed until the partial successes this year) to change the way the town budgets and deals with budget transfers.
2. She is incredibly energetic and, because of that, very knowledgeable about what happens in North Haven. For years she has attended hundreds of meetings of boards and commissions she hasn’t sat on, including the Board of Education. She has visited nearly every home in North Haven over the past few months, listening to what people have to say. She doesn’t wait for them to come to her. She also publishes her home phone number and e-mail address, and responds to everyone.
3. She has an open mind and knows how to listen. Because she wants to hear a range of views, she has no problem listening to people who disagree with her. I disagree with her, and that’s fine. That’s not fine with the people who currently run this town.
4. She is accountable and believes that accountability is central to democracy. For example, were she in Mr. Kopetz’s position, I have no doubt that she would have volunteered to be interviewed by the forensic investigator.
5. She believes in transparency. She wants town information available on-line, 24 hours a day, at home or at the library. She believes in upholding the letter and the spirit of the Freedom of Information Act, which is that an open government is an honest government and a government in which people can effectively participate.
6. She is ethical. She does not believe in allowing people with conflicts of interest to make town decisions. For a long time, she has been demanding major changes to our town’s Code of Ethics.
7. She is honest, for a politician. Yes, she uses spin and makes campaign promises. But she means what she says and does not falsely attack people or ignore them because they disagree with or oppose her.
8. She is a warm person. Don’t underestimate warmth. It is not a sign of weakness, but a sign of strength. Compassion is a valuable asset for any organization. It humanizes, it dignifies. This quality is not one that comes out at public meetings, where she is trying to rally the opposition. But it comes out strongly in her everyday interactions with people.
9. She is an intelligent person. She’s not great on her feet, speaking extemporaneously, but that is only one form of intelligence. She is excellent at pulling together ideas and applying them. She is thoughtful, not the rash person the Republicans portray her as. For example, her position on the Ierardis’ pensions was reached only after talking with experts in the field, who apparently gave her different opinions than the lawyer hired by Mr. Kopetz. As in medicine, there is also a need for second opinions in law.
10. She does not have a circle of cronies she will put into power. She has advisers (I too give her advice, for what it’s worth), but they are not interested in power, they are interested in getting this town back on track, on giving power back to the people who live here. Notice that Michael Mele, Gary Amato, and I are not on the ballot, nor will we end up on the payroll. Janet McCarty will not abuse the power given to her, and she will not let others abuse it, either.
Only comments with substance will be posted to this blog entry. Take your vitriol elsewhere.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
22 comments:
That was very well written Mr. Weschler.I have to say you've sold her very well. A point I would like to make is why don't more OFFICIAL people in the Democratic party come out in public with these types of statements instead of leaving this to people like yourself, Mr. Meile, and Mr. Amato? Although I commend all of you for your efforts,
this is a very strong POLITICAL machine that is being challenged here and any opportunity to gain a perception in your favor should be utilized.(and in politics many times, unfortunately, it's perception that counts)
I have seen Mr. Criscuolo confront adversity on the fire commision in years past and I consider him to be a formidable opponent to just about anyone. Yet he and other strong intelligent Democrats such as Bernie Mcgloughlin are visibly absent from many of the public (and televised) forums where much of the public's opinion is being formed. Sometimes, with all due respect to you and your allies, it appears that the Democrats have brought a rock to a gunfight so to speak.
Smart, ethical, energetic, informed, but . . .
I agree w/ all of your points re Janet except one. I don't see any evidence that she lacks "intelligence" for communication. Her comments at town meetings and in one-on-one discussions are always clear, concise, and articulate. On the other hand, I think her prepared speeches could be improved in terms of timing and delivery. The deliveries would be improved by memorizing the speeches and making sparing use of notes.
Nicky, you've hit on one of the reasons why I'm unaffiliated.
There are, however, some good Democratic candidates, and even some new faces with promise. Unfortunately, they too have been quiet, not rising to the occasion, not giving people positive reasons to vote for them beyond giving the Democrats a chance.
I've spoken at length with some, such as Patricia Brown and Marty Piccirillo (Board of Finance), and they've impressed me, and Brian Cummings (Planning & Zoning) is a good, intelligent person whom I can feel very comfortable voting for.
Word is , new proffesionaly made Kopetz endorsement commercial scheduled to start airing this weekend on local TV stations. Amazing what unlimited resources can do for you.
Janet and her team will do a great job.
Even if you do not agree with this list, how can you support the current administration!
If you don't vote for Janet you MUST vote AGAINST Kevin and his team.
In response to Sarah......
Better get some bigger rocks!
I hope people realize that not voting is the worst thing they can do.This is possibly one of the most important elections this town has ever faced.If reelected, the current administration will be empowered to operate with impunity to all moral and ethical standards,knowing they are unbeatable. Change can be good, even if its only for a short while.I encourage everyone to convince people to come out to the polls. Apathy is our worst enemy!
On one side there is the incumbent, with his 'army' of loyal soldiers ready to walk over a cliff to keep him in power and to defend their perks and powers that they have always assumed are for life (like their health plans:(
On the other side is a well intentioned but disorganized group that is trying to save this town from the perma-crooks. If this effort to rescue our town hall from the unethical, arrogant, alleged and non-alleged:( crooks is unsuccessful it will be a sad day.
I for one am very happy to see this list of reasons to vote for Janet McCarty. People have to have a reason to vote for an alternative, rather than just voting against something or someone they don't like. Given her long service to our town on important issues, as well as the positions she's taken over time, I think we have a pretty good idea of how a McCarty administration would operate. We would have an open and transparent town government where a well-informed public would be able to participate and tackle problems together. We would have respect for the taxpayer's money and superior services with competitive bidding. Perhaps most importantly for the spirit and soul of our town, the place where we live and call home, the place that tells so much about our identity among other residents of Connecticut, Janet will see to it that the town government under a McCarty administration will observe ethical rules. In other words, she will provide the good governance we deserve as citizens of North Haven.
I could devote reams of paper about why Kevin Kopetz doesn't deserve our vote, and I may yet. But we're not really voting against him, we are voting for Janet McCarty.
Mr. Wechsler,
Can you please explain why 2 weeks or so ago you wrote in one of your blog sites that "neither candidate is capable of running this town" and now you are listing 10 reasons why Ms. McCarty should be elected?Why would you tell people that "neither candidate is capable of running this town" which also means that Ms. McCarty is not capable of running this town.
You continue to speak out of both sides of your mouth.The bottom line is that she is a poor candidate and poor choice which is why she has lost 3 times already in this town.
Steve Fontana should be running for 1st selectman on the Democratic ticket.
You're wrong, Anonymous, Steve Fontana is not capable of running North Haven. He has less public administration experience than McCarty does, as did Kopetz when he was elected.
There is no inconsistency in my positions. I believe we need a professional town manager and a part-time (far cheaper) mayor, a position that McCarty would be perfect for. She would be in charge of policy, the town manager in charge of administration.
But since we don't have this setup, I have to back one of the candidates, and I wanted to show some of the often-ignored pluses in her record and personality.
Is that speaking out of one side of my mouth, Mr. Anonymous, who can speak out of ten sides of your mouth and we wouldn't know, because you won't say who you are?
It would be refreshing to have a REAL Economic Developement Director instead of a wannabe bad game show host! Remember the "this guy's got too much time on his hands" comment in reference to getting competive bids for insurance? Shows the mindset at town hall. The money misspent on the K of C building could have employed someone for ten years. Of course maybe people want more bedding stores and cleaners!
The Ten Reasons to Vote for Janet is great! Wish you could get it into the New Haven paper or the local North Haven papers so that more voters that need facts can read them clearly.
The thirteenth reason
That was a good piece, Rob. But let's not forget the 13th reason to vote for Janet. She is NOT connected with and is not an appologist for republicrooks.
Although the outgoing BOF chair, Peterson, urged that we bite the bullet and put everything behind us, today's New Haven Register reminds us that "Finance Director Vincent E. Palmeri was arrested Thursday on larceny and theft of firearms charges in connection with the ongoing investigation of municipal corruption in North Haven."
It seems that the ethical issues are not behind us. According to the Register, Palmeri "was charged with three counts each of second-degree larceny and stealing a firearm." The article reminds us that Palmeri was also "arrested in April for hindering prosecution, tampering with evidence and conspiracy in connection with the arrests of the former Parks and Recreation Director Joseph Ierardi and his wife, former Assistant Director Patricia Ierardi. Those cases are pending."
The Register asserts that "Second-degree larceny is a class C felony punishable by up to 10 years in prison and up to a $10,000 fine. Stealing a firearm is a class D felony punishable by up to five years in prison and up to a $5,000 fine."
Palmeri has been Mr. Kopetz' close associate for a long time. We must insist that Mr. Kopetz come clean on what he knew, when he knew it, and what he did. Did he simply pray that nobody would find out before the election? Is there a shred of evidence that Mr. Kopetz exhibited any sense of ethics and pro-active leadership?
Current events simply demand a change in leadership and, along with it, a change on the BOF committee. Voting a straight democratic ticket should be a no-brainer.
Gee, another alleged criminal allegedly arrested for allegedly committing another alleged crime.
I would be happy if just one person in town hall,just one, ANYONE, would APOLOGIZE to the taxpayers for the all the alleged criminal activity that allegedly happened while their party was allegedly in charge of our alleged town. I truly hope the taxpayers make this clear in the alleged upcoming election.
I am very concerned about the letter in today's CITIZEN entitled "what did candidate do for education". This certainly shows a disturbingly phony side to candidate McCarty.
Rob-
It's official, at least on the blogisphere, that political blogs rock! Thanks for bringing North Haven into the world of web communication.
I was on PTA Council with both Janet and Vera (the letter writer mentioned above). I was at Board of Ed meetings for 5 years as a school rep-Janet was at every one. What the writer doesn't mention is she works (or at least did then) for Jeffrey Donofrio's law firm(our Town Attorney), so there is definitely a partison relationship to the Republican party there. Vera, don't you remember when Janet ran the Curriculum Committee at PTA Council? I was there, you were there...Also notice the North Haven Education Foundation letter that states BOTH Kopetz and McCarty are on its Board of Directors. That letter made my blood boil, especially since I only saw Mr. Kopetz at one Board of Ed meeting, and that was when the old Superintendent was retiring and they had their little "going away" schmooze-fest.
I am very surprised to see the level of disdain from various writers regarding Janet McCarty in this weeks North Haven Citizen.
What was Bill Gambardella thinking in his criticism of the students who attended the Selectman's meeting?
Was he hand picked by Janet to run for treasurer? I hope not because he has made himself look very foolish and made Janet look foolish.
Rob, I think that you should know that the latest piece that the Dems have issued entitled " Warning desperate attacks ahead" has alienated some independents.
They have attacked Mr. Kopetz from every angle for months, basically called him a crook, and are now suggesting that they are being attacked and their opponents are making wild accusations towards them? They have labeled everyone in town government to be no good and now are saying that some candidates will say any thing to get elected?
Rob, you gotta talk to them, this makes Janet and Steve look very bad. It is not playing well because they are accusing the Republicans of doing what they have done for months.
In response to the most recent Anonymous, I have no role in the Democrats' campaign. I'm not crazy about it myself.
As for Bill Gambardella, I don't think he or any candidate was hand-picked by Janet McCarty. The Dems don't seem to work like that. That's one of the things I like most about them.
I don't know the piece you talk about (warning on desperate attacks), but I do believe that the Dems have been too passive in their criticism and too focused on such things as Palmeri's sick pay.
They have not called Kopetz a crook, but Kopetz's ploy in the last seconds of the debate proved to me that he is deeply unethical. Any belief that he was merely passive and silent was undermined by what he did.
False attacks have for years been a strategy employed by Republicans in North Haven. This blog has discussed several recent instances.
The Republicans have set the tone for what is happening now. They do false attacks far better than the Dems, that's for sure, but I prefer the sort of truthful criticism I have presented in this blog.
In response to anonymous, I suppose when Mr. Kopetz simulated a personal attack that did not happen, at the end of the farce debate, that was all right! Mrs. Mccarty never accused him of anything and it was a nice ploy with whole indignent little me and my family are offended tactic. Fortunately, most intelligent voters saw right through it, including the baloney snowball follow up by the mighty Republican spin machine. You all obviously hate having done to you, what you have been doing to the average citizen in public and town meetings for years! All these letters in the papers are from mostly long time members of the Republican Town Committee and I'll bet some of them aren't even written by the signers of the letters. Let's just keep in mind that all this "alleged" criminal activity wasn't perpetrated by some insignificant little clerks some where. It was "allegedly" perpetrated by people who were not only very high ranking TOWN OFFICIALS but very high ranking,repected and long time members of THE REPUBLICAN TOWN COMMITTEE!! So gimme a break with this yap about " Oh we're shocked", or "We're just poor little political volunteers who are so hurt and trying to make things better". You're just all trying to save your little positions in the town and you know it. YOU ALL DISGUST ME AND I HAVE HAD ENOUGH! Limited scope audits,filibustering and rule bending in public meetings,farce debates, Save you're pathetic little sympathy campaign for the blind mindless sheep that you all so proudly lead around by the nose.
One more thing, if you truly didn't see what was so blatantly "allegedly" going on, then NONE of you were really doing your jobs any way, PROTECTING THE PUBLIC INTEREST,and you don't DESERVE to be in public office!!!
Post a Comment