
The stated goal of the Spotlight is to inform voters whether candidates are following through on their campaign promises. That’s an easy way to make any candidate look bad, since candidates almost never fulfill all their campaign promises, and some may take years to fulfill, no matter how hard a candidate tries (the coming recession will make things especially difficult).
But the stated goal of the Community Watchdog Project website (www.sctir.com), which is where this and future columns are to appear, is different from the column’s stated goal. The Watchdog Project’s goal is “to abolish illegal immigration in the State of Connecticut beginning with New Haven, and to protect our right to be American.”
In the Hartford Courant (August 26, 2007), Ms. Kivela is quoted as saying, “If these people actually want to come to America because they want a slice of the American pie, if they want to live the great American dream that somebody has sold them, why are they bringing their thug ways with them?” This language will sound familiar to many older immigrants in North Haven, or from stories our parents or grandparents told us.
But Ms. Kivela’s Watchdog Spotlight is not about immigration, nor does it mention that immigration is her organization’s principal issue (she is the Community Watchdog Project’s Press Secretary).
Ms. Kivela’s column is an attack on First Selectwoman-elect Janet McCarty, as well as the New Haven Register (“slanted and biased reporting”) and people who “fanned the flames by embellishing on any kernel of truth.”
Ms. Kivela emphasizes how emotional Ms. McCarty is, as are, she says, those who voted for her. But her column is extremely emotional, as is her organization’s website
For example, New Haven Mayor John DeStefano is pictured as Che Guevera on a poster that says “John DeStefano - For a Socialized New Haven” (the image is soon to be featured on “our DeStefano Socialism apparel”). That does not sound like rational analysis of issues to me.
I welcome Ms. Kivela’s participation in the discussion of town government, but her emotional attack on people and their emotions is not a good start. Her accusation that Ms. McCarty’s intention to fire finance director Vincent Palmeri is based on rumor and gossip is not accurate. She knows that McCarty and others have been criticizing the work of Mr. Palmeri for several years, and that their criticisms go far beyond the grounds for arrest.
By the way, unlike the North Haven Info blog, you cannot place comments on the Community Watchdog blog without providing your name and email address. To participate here, you only have to register with Google (I have no access to this information).
Also, it does not appear that the Community Watchdog blog (if that is where the Spotlight columns are to be placed; this and the ability of town residents to comment are not discussed in the column) is functioning yet. But they seem to be testing it, so it should come on-line soon.
14 comments:
To Mr. Freda, From the "Community Watchdog" website
"EVIL THRIVES WHEN GOOD MEN DO NOTHING" Edmund Burke.
Take heed Mr. Freda, because that's what your track record says you did in the past to make things better for the citizens with the BOF...... NOTHING
Until you show me otherwise, as third selectman I will expect nothing more from you than just 100% pure partisan bullspin! An intelligent political gunslinger sent in just to gum up the works and try to make the Dems stumble. Time will tell if you're really watching out for the best interests of this town Mr. Freda or just your party's best interests. Based on past performance, I'd assume the latter.... Feel free to prove me wrong! Time WILL tell!!
I for one am disgusted with our local news, especially News Channel 8 and the Advisor. The Citizen seems to cover local political stories more often, but the Advisor, never, and WTNH seems to be enthralled by right wing interests. Small surprise that with the victory of several Democratic politicians, that all of a sudden we need some sort of editorializing "watchdog." What is this group? Who are its members? Who funds them? I see that donations aren't tax deductible.
Looking back, I am reminded of Swiftboat-Whitewater phony scandal peddlers flapping their gums and stinking everything up. I'm also reminded of Karl Rove's brand of politics in Texas.
If the Advisor wants to push Republican talking points, I think a little community activism would be in order, such as a campaign to point out their inaccuracies, and cancel our unsought subscriptions. We could also use some local investigative journalism to find out about these people and determine their affiliations. If we drove circulation down by 10, 15, or 20 percent and notified their advertisers that they could negotiate better terms, they might think twice about what they're contemplating.
These people mean to divide our community. Let's make their margin razor-thin, then push them over the edge.
In response to the most recent Anonymous, it's my understanding that the Advisor required the Community Watchdog Project to pay for its column, probably due to its length or its political nature (the Citizen ran it as a letter to the editor, because it has different rules). I don't believe that the Advisor has supported the Community Watchdog Project in any way.
In any event, the Advisor is not really a newspaper, but a community information and advertising publication. It may make political decisions regarding letters to the editor (it has rejected mine in the past, for example), but this is, I think, the limit to its political involvement.
In response to Big D, please don't continue the Community Watchdog Project's misquotation of Edmund Burke. He never said this or other versions of this quotation attributed to him. If you're interested, read an enlightening web essay about this misquotation (it was even the subject of two William Safire columns in the NY Times Magazine back in 1980 and 1981).
Whatever Mr. Wechsler, quote or misquote
The point of my comment still stands!
Dear Big Al,
You make a fair statement and I suppose that time will tell.
I am not interested in trying to "gum up the works" as you say. I have previously stated on this site that the new administration should have ample time to prove themselves.
You are correct though that "time will tell" if I am watching out for the town"s best interests. I accept your perspective.
As far as Edmund Burke is concerned, being a history buff, I was interested in your choice of historical figures to quote because he was an ardent supporter of the rights of the people.
Mr. Burke was considered in some regards as the father of modern conservatism who was a proponent of the people and their rights, he endorsed the rights of the American colonies against Great Britain just prior to the American Revolution and was a huge proponent of free trade and the free market system without government trying to manipulate or control that free trade.
As it turned out, what he was endorsing back then from a political perspective was a healthy and vibrant "two-party system" as opposed to a one party control or monopoly in government.
Based on the last 38 years in North Haven, I would assume that this is one of your reasons for citing Mr. Burke as a point of reference.
Actually, Big D chose the quotation because it is the motto of the Community Watchdog Project, and he was making the point that both sides need to be watched.
To Big D,
I have to apologize for addressing you as Big Al.
There is another blogger that goes by the name of Big Al so please accept my apologies.
Sincerely,
Michael freda
Apparently Edmund Burke would be a fine choice of someone to emmulate in government.
Why not leave Mr. Freda alone? Let him prove to us, by his actions, that he has the best interests of North Haven in mind.
Because Mr Freda's past INACTIONS suggest otherwise!!
Dear Mr. Leahy,
Thank you for your comment, although it was not neccessary for you to do so.
I signed up on this site shortly after I was voted off the BOF because I thought that it would be of interest to the bloggers here for me to offer an alternate point of view on this site.
After reading the most recent characterization of me as a "moral fraud", I am coming to the conclusion that I probably was incorrect in my assessment when I signed up on November 9th.
Keep up your good work at participating in the town meetings and the BOF meetings where you have offered your various points of view.
Sincerely,
Michael Freda
Another Republicrook bites the dust. Bye Bye, so long, don't let the door hit you in the backside. Not as good at CATCHING as they are at PITCHING are they now?
Could it have been that your PARTY told you to "knock it off" and get off this board now that you're their man Mr. Freda? Hmmm Kinda makes ya wonder doesn't it?
Dustin Gold, the head, or "Chief Strategist," of the Community Watchdog Project, sent in a comment with information about New Haven-related activities, so I did not run it.
He also wanted people to know there was a new "comment feature" on the CWP website. But it appears that the "comment feature" only allows you to send him comments, not that they will appear on the website. And to do so, you have to give your full name, address, phone number, and email address -- unless you decide to lie.
I can find nothing on the website relating to North Haven. It's all about New Haven and immigration.
Post a Comment